For the past decade, I have worked across various roles in an Indonesian contractor. From site and project management to BIM management and digital leadership. During this journey, I have seen BIM praised as a silver bullet and mandated as a requirement. However, one thing that I learned is:
BIM is not a one-size-fits-all. Its value depends on how well it is tailored to each project objectives and requirements.
Without this tailoring, BIM implementation can become layer of complexity which adding processes without necessarily improving outcomes. Only when it is aligned with clear purposes, BIM becomes a strategic enabler not just a deliverable.
In theory, full BIM implementation at the highest maturity level on every project sounds ideal. in practice, especially within the Indonesian construction industry, it is neither optimal nor realistic. Because projects vary significantly in scale, complexity, delivery method, client maturity, digital capability and expectation. Applying the same BIM scope to a small building project and a large, complex data center, for example, rarely makes sense. The effort and cost may outweigh the benefits.
Over the years, my own question has shifted from “Can we use BIM?” to “How we can reap the maximum Benefits of BIM?”. BIM delivers its greatest impact when it is treated as an enabler, not merely a contractual deliverable. In successful projects, BIM is aligned with clear, practical objectives, such as:
- Supporting method statements and construction sequencing
- Improving coordination between structure, architecture, and MEP
- Reducing rework through clash detection
- Improving safety planning and hazard identification
A more effective approach is to right-size BIM implementation, so we need to understand its purposes. For example at tender stage, BIM may focus on construction sequencing, and quantity take offs to support pricing and budgeting. For low complexity project progress monitoring and quantity support may be sufficient. While for high risk project (line data center with complex MEP) needs deeper BIM integration for advance coordination and staging. The key is to be selective, ensuring that the effort invested is proportional to the value created.
Contractors operate under tight margins. Hence, every additional scope of BIM must therefore be justified. A mature BIM strategy should considers
- Cost of modeling and coordination
- BIM competency within the project team
- Time required to develop and update the models
- Expected reduction in rework, or claims
When BIM is tailored correctly, the benefit-cost ratio becomes positive. On the other hand, when BIM is over engineered, the ratio might flip.
In Indonesia, currently BIM adoption is growing, but maturity levels still vary widely across clients, consultants, and contractors. However the competency gap has narrowed over the past few years. A successful BIM implementation requires understanding of the project and clear purposes of its BIM adoption. The goal is not to do everything digitally but to build smarter digitally and physically. After 10 years working within an Indonesian contractor, my conviction about BIM is simple:
BIM should adapt to the project, not force the project to adapt BIM
When BIM is tailored and aligned with project objectives, delivery strategy, and cost realities, it becomes a powerful enabler. The future of BIM in Indonesia lies not in the highest level implementation, but in smart, purpose-based, and value-driven adoption. Just as every construction project is unique, BIM implementation should be too.

































